Well, perhaps not "nonsense" so much as the thoughtless assertion that
comes from having to fill column inches by a deadline? And, as Steve says,
perhaps he meant SRAM and Campy?

Back to Bicycling: 30 years ago, when I started cycling again after a more
or less 10 year hiatus, I recall eagerly anticipating the next issue of
Bicycling at the grocery store, until I finally subscribed. I do think it
was a better mag 30 years ago, though. But after about 15 years of reading
it, the truth of what someone at a bike shop once said to me, "The same
articles come around again and again," became apparent, and I stopped
reading it -- about the same time, btw, that I dumped my lycra, helmet, and
padded gloves. Make of that what you will.

I've subscribed to or at least read many bike mags -- Road Bike Action,
Mountain Bike Action (Zap Espinoza!!!), Dirt Rag, the omnium gatherum from
G Britain whose name I forget -- a big name, Velo News, BRIN, and of course
BQ. BQ is the only one I subscribe to now, and it's by far the best in most
categories.

BUT!!! While BQ has expanded it coverage a great deal, where it falls short
is the quality and variety of writing. Understand me: not the quality of
the information -- that is head, shoulders, knees, and toes above
everything else. But while Zap, for instance, was no great thinker, even
limiting the discussions to bikes, even his MTB Action had a liveliness
that -- even while you spat condemnatory curses -- drew you at least
moderately to anticipate it.

Of course, one reason I dumped Bicycling is that most of its writing was
pretty dull, after they dumped their editors -- Bill Strickland, the aging,
raging roadie whose name I forget, and others in the annum horribilem 2
decades or so ago.

Spouting my own opinion from the housetops, I say that the best thing that
Jan can do for his otherwise excellent mag is to assemble a stable of good
writers who are also cycling afficionados. Keep the focus on
650B/randoneuring/low trail/front loading/French constructeurs -- I love
reading about those, tho' the Jones, the Alaska fatbike expedition, and the
tours, are icing on the cake. The history in particular interests me a
great deal.

But I think that BQ has outgrown its original scope and is on the verge of
becoming a truly popular, professionally kitted, cycling mag (the move to
color was another step). The one important step remaining, IMO, is boosting
the variety and style of the writing.

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, jeffrey kane <[email protected]> wrote:

> So much nonsense. He says *"the bikes are rare, and so are the brakes*"
> and then lists 11 models of currently available brake sets.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to