Let's look at this from another perspective. Most of the posters on RBW are 
also drivers. I would bet that almost every one of us breaks the law in our 
cars with regularity. As an example, the aforementioned 9D has a speed 
limit of 30mph. Although I am conscientious about my speed on local roads, 
portions of this road are engineered in a way that makes it a huge struggle 
to stay at the posted speed limit, including a section with two lanes. 
(Especially in a machine designed to hit speeds of 90-100mph.) I generally 
go about 35mph in this section, and I'm passed on the right (where a 
cyclist trying to get to the bridge crossing without riding on the sidewalk 
would be) by virtually everyone.

This is pertinent to the discussion here, as every increase in auto speed 
translates to greater chance of death for pedestrians and cyclists in a 
collision with that vehicle. I won't even bring up how many of us do the 
posted limit on highways. So even though all the infrastructure and traffic 
signals are designed for the convenience of the automobile, if it veers off 
of what is the reality, people will disregard the law. And not even for 
safety--in fact "speeding" is demonstrably less safe--but for their own 
convenience.. Even grandmothers and grandfathers. If you have never gone 
above the speed limit, my apologies.

On Sunday, February 2, 2020 at 7:47:22 AM UTC-5, Fullylugged wrote:
>
> Cyclists and motor vehicle drivers should both follow traffic laws. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b0b71266-416d-42ff-882a-0e6c88af370d%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to