> I've always been fond of the original Stumpjumpers chainstay > design.http://www.trek4fun.com/images/my_bikes/1983_stumpjumper_sport/1983_s... > No chainring rub issues there.
Thanks for the link. Been a long time since I saw one of those. I wonder if there was a functional issue that stopped others from copying or if design stayed away for aesthetic or financial reasons. On Apr 30, 7:07 am, Garth <[email protected]> wrote: > It really depends on the terrain one rides weather a HSG would work > for an individual. A 24/44/48 and a 13-32 7sp FW or even a 12-32 8sp > cassette is very versatile. I believe Robert Beckman still prefers > this drivetrain on his Sakkit Touring bikes. . . which are designed > for on and off road. > > Bombadil design aside ..... a frame could be/has been made to take big > tires and still use HSG and lower Q cranks, at least in 26" size. > I've always been fond of the original Stumpjumpers chainstay > design.http://www.trek4fun.com/images/my_bikes/1983_stumpjumper_sport/1983_s... > No chainring rub issues there. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
