...and that any ride you come back from alive is a good ride!

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:51 PM, cyclotourist <cyclotour...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I did a quite scientific study of this earlier this summer.  The results:  Not
> much 
> difference.<http://cyclotourist.blogspot.com/2010/05/bike-servations.html>
> The good news is that both bikes are a lot of fun to ride!
>
> Almost got out for a ride today, but clear spells always seemed to line up
> with day-care duties.
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, charlie <charles_v...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yea really............the one pound frame weight diff can't make one
>> bike a "thudder" (whatever that means) its got to be the combination
>> of elements that influence ride qualities. As far as performance goes
>> you'd have to measure it over a long period and have direct
>> comparisons which is really hard to do. Headwinds, my energy,
>> hydration etc. there are so many variables that it just seems too
>> difficult to make comparisons. I have several bikes that range in
>> weight and components and even type and there seems to be no rhyme or
>> reason as to why one days "fast ride" happens on the heavy bike and
>> the next ride on the race bike is actually slower.  Actually I don't
>> even care........ I just want a derailleurless frame that will take
>> some use buy a middle aged, overweight guy who wants to ride to work
>> in the spring and summer and not have it prematurely crack somewhere.
>> A little thicker tubing makes me feel better about my purchase in the
>> long run.......perhaps its a non issue in the real world as it appears
>> some of you are riding your QB's loaded with groceries or hopping ruts
>> and rocks on trails. That's certainly not something I would be doing
>> but rather up to 96 miles of smooth pavement during the week...... and
>> the primal diet.
>>
>> On Nov 20, 1:46 pm, CycloFiend <cyclofi...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > on 11/20/10 5:49 AM, robert zeidler at zeidler.rob...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> > Just as an added thought.... He is going too far in the "stout"
>> direction.
>> >  These things are way overbuilt and as a result, too heavy, or at least
>> > heaveir than they ought to be.  I know they don't care about that, but
>> at
>> > the end of a long day, that is when you start to notice the weight.  I
>> used
>> > think, well, I'll just get 5 lbs lighter and it's a wash, but it doesn't
>> > work that way for some reason.  My .02, YMMV.
>> >
>> > I'd have to dig back into my notes, but I think the resultant frame
>> > differences between "heavy" tubing and "light" tubing might mean a pound
>> on
>> > a ~60 cm frame.
>> >
>> > Now, you might be able to come up with a five pound difference in the
>> full
>> > build pretty readily, but it's not specifically a frameset issue.
>> >
>> > It does seem that the most recent models and revisions have tended
>> towards
>> > stouter framesets, but now that those changes have shaken through, we're
>> > presented with a range of models, which you could think of as "limber"
>> to
>> > "stout"...
>> >
>> > Roadeo/San Marcos - > Hilsen - > Hillborne -> Atlantis -> Hunquapillar -
>> >
>> > Bombadil
>> >
>> > My Quickbeam seems just a hair more limber than my Hilsen, and they are
>> both
>> > right in that range of feel that works for just about everything I like
>> to
>> > do.
>> >
>> > - Jim
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jim Edgar
>> > cyclofi...@earthlink.net
>> >
>> > Three T-shirts Now Available:
>> > "I've Got Downtube Shifters..." S/S T-shirt
>> > Cyclocross - "More Cowbell" L/S T-shirt
>> > "One Cog - Zero Excuses" L/S T-shirthttp://www.cyclofiend.com/stuff
>> >
>> > Gallery updates now appear here -http://cyclofiend.blogspot.com
>> >
>> > Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries -http://www.cyclofiend.com
>> > Current Classics - Cross Bikes
>> > Singlespeed - Working Bikes
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> David
> Redlands, CA
>
> *...in terms of recreational cycling there are many riders who would
> probably benefit more from
> improving their taste than from improving their performance.* - RTMS
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to