Could you just get a clamp-on stop for an FD on the mystery bike? Or is there another reason why it will not take an FD (like the angle between ST and chainstays or something)? I know it has a very specialized geometry for the type of riding/handling it is intended for, but am just curious if there really is a limitation preventing use of available FDs or if one could be designed/modified for it. Of course, I'm sure some folks will use an IGH on these rigs.
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:57:13 PM UTC-4, James Warren wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure that the new Riv model with no cable stop for front > shifting (and hence no easy way to do a FD) would be a great candidate the > new cogs that SRAM is coming out with: 11 speed cluster in the rear with 42 > as the largest one and only one chainring in the front. > > You could do 34 or 32 as your single front chainring and still pretty much > have a lowest gear suitable for touring. With a 32 in front, the 32/42 low > would be very similar to a 24T granny combined with 32T rear cog. With a 34 > in front, the 34/42 low would be a bit easier than a 24/29. > > The lack of large outer chainring would provide good real estate for a > pants guard. Also, I've been riding my 1x11 Alfine QB a lot lately, and > it's nice to have a wide gear range and no FD. Just a bit less complication > and a beautiful bare seat tube when you look down. I think it would be even > better with a rear derailleur instead of IGH. > > Such a bike would be really sweet. > > -Jim W. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ypRDVGMsdKsJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
