Down the rabbit hole we go, talking about "fast bikes", blergh. I think there are just so many factors that go into one bike feeling "fast" over another--tires, rider position, crank length, bb, spoke count, type of rims, level of components, rider abilty, wind resistance, terrain, etc. I like to think of the frameset as a foundation of what you want to do but you build it up from there according to its purpose. Can you build a lightweight Bombadil for club rides? I bet you could, but you would be working against its intended purpose. On the other hand though I would imagine Tommy is way "faster" on his new Bombadil than I am on my 70s Peugeot "racing" bike, in this case due to the fact he is a young guy in good shape and I am well not, haha. So the "fast" moniker is pretty misleading on the whole I find. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery < [email protected]> wrote:
> One of the most misunderestimated factors contributing to bike performance > is a fast-sounding catalog description. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/T_C1ZlwRxFQJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
