Yeah baby, you're talkin about the "dickie"? (aka mock turtle neck from the early 70s)... We used to wear em under button down shirts... I wish they'd bring it back.
Bobby "Austin Powers" Birmingham On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:45:16 AM UTC-5, Patrick Moore wrote: > > I agree that the mitts-without-thumbs are dumb. Not even sure about the > mitts when you can get good gloves that are more effective, smaller, and > that cost no more or even less. > > But I like the wind shield idea, if not necessarily the product. My own > take on it is to chop the body away from a wool turtleneck, leaving only > the neck and a flap that extends from the shoulders -- slightly over the > shoulders -- to the bottom of the chest. I find this very useful as a > shield for throat that provides a bit of insulation for the upper chest and > that can be worn on those kinda/kinda days when you don't want a full layer > underneath or over. These are easy to remove -- just pull them over your > head. > > Far less dorky than wearing one over your shirt. > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Edwin W <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> >> Ones I don't like: >> Half Mitts thumbs. Half Mitts without thumbs were a bad idea, to sell >> individual thumbs even worse. >> Windshield. You could make the same argument as for the Half Mitts >> (dorky, but practical), but I won't! >> >> >> -- > Burque (NM) > > Resumes that get interviews: > http://www.resumespecialties.com/ > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
