On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Thank you, got both emails! Will take a closer look -- we were busy with > releasing Rcpp 0.10.0 which will rock :) > Sorry, I posted to list from wrong address; 0.10.0 looks great. I found the copious informational links at the bottom of the announcement very helpful. Would this make sense "upstream" in Armadillo? Or do you want the R RNG for > reproducibility? I hadn't even thought of trying to push this upstream, but yes, exact reproduction of R's behavior was a goal. > Also, you may need to add RNGScope() if you use R's RNG. > > Yes, I should have mentioned that in my post. Calling RNGScope() is left to the user, since multiple calls to sample() can conceivably happen inside a single RNGScope(). -Christian -- A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal – Panama!
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
