> > | Also, you may need to add RNGScope() if you use R's RNG. > | > | > | > | Yes, I should have mentioned that in my post. Calling RNGScope() is > left to > | the user, since multiple calls to sample() can conceivably happen inside > a > | single RNGScope(). > > With that, maybe best to be included as another example in RcppArmadillo ?
Why? The proposed behavior is the same as sugar's rnorm, etc.: a utility function that uses R's RNG -- it's the user's responsibility to properly scope the RNG. When time permits, I'll add Romain's comments on sugarizing sample (which I *think* I understand), along with some testing code. best, Christian -- A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal – Panama!
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
