Nothing wrong with discussing it. Doesn't mean that I'll switch. Still a firm believer that electric power is better overall for RC Tank Combat. :)
Mike ________________________________ From: Buck Cronk <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: Why Not? New Ideas Sounds like my little post started lots of gears going in these heads. Now what are the safety concerns, exactly? On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >In a message dated 5/17/2012 12:36:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >[email protected] writes: >Hydrostatic drive is an interesting idea for a larger tank. The systems are >already proven in higher quality lawn mowers and zero turn mowers. Heck, >betcha the drive system from one of those mowers could be salvaged and used >with little trouble. :) >> >>Mikethe only thing i could see being an issue is being able to control the speed (variable) and the ..... (can't think of the word) of the valve control in place of those control arms on the mower > >Chris > -- >You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. >To post a message, send email to [email protected] >To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] >Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat > -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
