Sounds like my little post started lots of gears going in these heads. Now what are the safety concerns, exactly?
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > In a message dated 5/17/2012 12:36:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Hydrostatic drive is an interesting idea for a larger tank. The systems > are already proven in higher quality lawn mowers and zero turn mowers. > Heck, betcha the drive system from one of those mowers could be salvaged > and used with little trouble. :) > > Mike > > the only thing i could see being an issue is being able to control the > speed (variable) and the ..... (can't think of the word) of the valve > control in place of those control arms on the mower > > Chris > > -- > You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat > -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
