Benjamin A Abrahamse <babra...@mit.edu> wrote: > When a resource has parallel statements of responsibility on its chief > source of information, but only the "connecting words" are parallel, not > the names themselves, how does one treat this under RDA? > > >
Monkeywrench. An example from ISBD 1.4.5.10.2: 8 capriccios : hegedüre, második hegedii kiséretével = für Violine, mit Begleitung der zweiten Violine / Henryk Wieniawski ; átnézte és ujjrenddel allátta = revidiert und mit Fingersatz versehen von Jenö Hubay Note Wieniawski is mentioned only once, and Hubay only in the parallel SOR, the primary SOR left incomplete. ISBD's transcription instruction (1.4.5.1) simply reads: A statement of responsibility is transcribed in the terms in which it appears on the resource. Is doubling up on the names in the various SORs an application of RDA 1.7.7's "intended to be read twice" instruction? -- Mark K. Ehlert Minitex <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
