Although that sounds like a really good idea, without an added option,
unfortunately, I do not think the RDA instructions for Extent of Text
(3.4.5.2)  do not allow us to use 'other' terms.

Even though 3.4.1.3 says " (For instructions on using other terms to
designate the type of unit see 3.4.1.5.)" and 3.4.1.5 allows alternative
terms, continuing down 3.4.1.3 takes us to Exceptions for Cartographic
resources, Notated music, Still images, Text, and Three-dimensional forms. 

For all of those types of resources, except Notated music and Text, the
recording instructions say "If none of the terms listed above is
appropriate, use a term designating the type of unit as concisely as
possible".

Notated music (3.4.3.1) says: "Apply the instructions given under 3.4.3.2
when recording the extent of a printed or manuscript resource consisting of
notated music (with or without accompanying text and/or illustrations)" and
"For resources consisting of notated music in other media (e.g.,
microforms), apply the basic instructions given under 3.4.1" which limits us
to using only the terms provided under 3.4.3.2 for printed or manuscript
notated music, although we are free to use alternative terms for 'other
media'.

Text (3.4.5.1) says: " Apply the instructions given under 3.4.5.2-3.4.5.22
when recording the extent of a resource consisting of one or more volumes,
sheets, portfolios, or cases containing printed or manuscript text, with or
without accompanying illustrations" and "For resources consisting of text in
other media (e.g., microforms), apply the basic instructions given under
3.4.1", which limits us to using only the terms provided under
3.4.5.2-3.4.5.22 for printed or manuscript text, although we are free to use
alternative terms for 'other media'.

So, until (if) we get an added option, if it seems important for
identification or selection  we can, perhaps, add Details of Base Materials
notes (500) for things like: 
Board books: e.g., "On board pages"
Rag books: e.g., "On cloth pages"
Bath books: e.g., "On plastic pages"

And (perhaps) Notes on Dimensions (500) for things that are shaped strangely
(Die-cut books)

Along with the Note on Expression (500) for things that contain different
content types, e.g., "A pop-up book with pull out tabs"

I don't think we have a Content Type for a 'Scented book', so would that be
covered under Base Material or, perhaps, Applied Material: Scent?

Deborah

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  
Deborah Fritz
TMQ, Inc.
debo...@marcofquality.com
www.marcofquality.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 2:22 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] What is the appropriate RDA element for a term like
"Board book" or "Scented book"

Deborah Friz posted earlier:

>Does anyone know, which, if any, of the RDA elements for Physical
Carriers >would be appropriate for this type of information:

>>Board book

etc.

In addition to a 655 genre heading, while it might need an RDA option to be
added, one possibility would be to have a collation as some have for
atlases:

300  $a1 board book (25 pages) :$bcoloured illustrations ;$c24 cm


   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to