Are relationship designators required?
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:01 PM, J. McRee Elrod <m...@slc.bc.ca> wrote:
> Dana van Meter said:
>
> >The examples in the PCC Guidelines seem to indicate that one can use
> >creator and contributor type relationship designators in the same field,
> >as long as they are entered in WEMI order.
>
> Yes you may. But I still don't agree with the choice of main entry.
> The poet is author, and needs only the one $e or $4. The editor
> needs a whole string, including translator, which is not a main entry
> role.
>
> >One could also use a combination of 100 & 700 fields for the same
> >person, with only creator >relationship designators in the 100 field,
> >and contributor type >designators in the 700 field
>
> I don't think so. IMNSHO you should not have two entries for the same
> person in the same record, not even real name and pseudonym.
>
> >I'm starting to feel like just whimping out on this one and accepting
> >the AACR2 copy, but adding a 700 for Garfinkle.
>
> Please add it to the master record, whatever you decide on locally.
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
> ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
>
--
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu
Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not
represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information
or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that
of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School
of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a
courtesy for information only.
