My understanding of "transferred to digital printing" is that the publisher has converted in-house the typography originally presented in mechanical form to a digital equivalent. As a process internal to the publishing house, I am not certain why they feel it is necessary to identify this, unless it is an advertisement of their technological advancement. I have treated it just as I would a new print run, which is to say that I ignore it.
John Myers, Catalog Librarian Schaffer Library, Union College Schenectady NY 12308 518-388-6623 mye...@union.edu On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Julie Moore <julie.renee.mo...@gmail.com>wrote: > > This reminds me of my recent post on Autocat ... that uses the phrase > "Transferred to digital printing 2010." I guess I am still pondering > exactly what that means - and how this falls into the FRBR terms >
