On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:00 AM, Hubbitus wrote:
Andrew Ferguson wrote:
Correct. And according to your logs, everything went fine. Those
exception messages were all handled -- printing them was only
informational. Thanks for running the test.
But exception is not best way to finish backup on production
machine, do you have another thing?
May be is more correct catch it, and print out normal informational
messages, if it is not realy errors??
They were being printed only because you had the "-v 5" option. Those
messages are printed when the exception occurs on the remote end, but
is handled by the local end.
And what about not worked --exclude?
May be I should fill bug for that? Where?
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=rdiff-backup
Andrew
_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki