Andrew Ferguson wrote: > They were being printed only because you had the "-v 5" option. Those > messages are printed when the exception occurs on the remote end, but > is handled by the local end.
I'm not Python programmer, and understand this traceback very approximately. So, why rdiff-backup do not catch it and writes more friendly error messages? When I'm increase verbose level, I expect more details in output, but unhandled exceptions seems as error in any case... Andrew Ferguson wrote: > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=rdiff-backup Thank you. I fill bug #24571. Andrew Ferguson, thank you very much for all answers. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
