Good morning all.Thanks again to Greg for shepherding me through the process. He does, however, give me too much credit.
I've done a little investigation this morning and I found this page: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1768943/building-boost-on-linux-library-names
I notice the same thing on my system in that the system's boost 1.39 libraries have an -mt suffix in their name, while the 1.41 libraries do not. Is it possible that a simple naming convention change is the culprit here?
-Kirk On Jan 17, 2010 3:02am, Gianluca Sforna <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Greg Landrum [email protected]> wrote:
> I have successfully specified an alternate
> boost directory using cmake v2.8.0, but I guess Fedora 12 comes with
> v2.6.
Yes, for the records it's 2.6.4.
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
