Dick,
I think im in William's camp and you may have gathered from my earlier post in
this thread. The actual logic and safety concerned in reality and practice may
be totally true and valid from your perspective (and in reality), however the
wording of the code allows for you to get a out of the blue expensive
correction. it is really to obscure in trying to describe 2 senarios in one
sentence and i know form a hell week that i had last week that if you run into
ahj not being satisfied, you have some heat on your shoulders. I agree in
theory that the feeder would always be unable to really be overloaded with the
overcurrent protection there at the main breaker, only the bussing in the
sub-panel is a concern. its just that the code is so well worded for daftness.
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: [email protected]
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
