Dick:
I do not desire to find building official who insist on a strict
interpretation of the code, but it is a reality in our jurisdictions. We
have to be pro-active and know the code better than they do, or we lose
money when we are assessed corrective actions that increase our
costs. Bruce is a living example of this (I think I incorrectly called him
Brian, sorry). I hope our discussion and Bruce's experience is a lesson
for other wrenches. This is, after all, the purpose of this forum.
Thanks for the kind words. It is a pleasure talking shop with you.
Sincerely,
William Miller
At 02:47 PM 8/2/2009, you wrote:
William,
You may well find inspectors and others who will agree with you on this. I
remain firmly unconvinced. Yes, the code may be taken literally. . . . .and
also, sometimes, be taken out of context. I believe you are doing that
here. It
is impossible to use words in such an airtight manner that they cannot be
misinterpreted. The NEC is riddled with wording that often serves mostly to
"muddy the waters".
I truly respect your desire and record of doing things safely and
professionally
to the highest standards, or if you deem those standards inadequate, to
improve
on them yourself.
As regards our discussion here, I respectfully suggest you speak with the
electrical inspector or AHJ, before you bid, so you don't include line items
that may not be required. Then you may decide if you wish to include them in
your bid anyhow. Or not.
Thanks for your sincere concern that things be done well.
I've got to get back to work.
Dick
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: [email protected]
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
