I have always read metal conduit, The reason being the solar is unfused source 
circuits, and there is no way for overcurrent protective devices to open.  
Therefore, the conductors must be protected from starting a fire under 
conditions of continuous overcurrent. 
darryl
  

--- On Fri, 12/4/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] 690.32(E) + MC?
> To: "RE-wrenches" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 5:18 PM
> I
> did a project a while ago for a supplier / Installing out
> fit (who has their in house engineering types), who told me
> that either MC or maybe AC cable did comply with 690.32E.
> today I'm being told that's not the case, and I
> can't seem to put my finger on it ... any pointers?
> thanks db
> 
> 
> Dan Brown
> President
> Foxfire Energy Corp.
> Renewable Energy Systems
> (802)-483-2564
> www.Foxfire-Energy.com
> NABCEP #092907-44
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 
> 


      
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to