Once you determine the real pump requirements (as others have mentioned, this 
is critical - IME particularly if the "well guy" sized and sold the pump) and 
if a larger than SQflex pump is needed, I have had good luck using VFDs to 
drive three-phase pumps with single phase power.  You can pay Franklin the big 
$$ for their system, but a commodity VFD from someone like Automation Direct 
will set you back about $100/HP and (up to 3 HP) will accept single phase input 
power.  This gets you sophisticated motor protection, programmable ramp soft 
starts, restart delays, and a plethora of input and output terminals for 
shutdown switches, PID sensor inputs, etc. and will allow you to create all 
manner of interesting system behavior.  Most also include a (software 
programmable) runtime limitation or alarm which can prevent  scenarios like 
Chris described below.  3-phase motors are more efficient anyway so I seriously 
doubt we will sell a traditional single phase pump or fan again.





On Jun 19, 2010, at 22:37 , frenergy wrote:
> Ray,
>  
>         Yes, thus my qualification:"seems to be pretty bombproof". 
>  
>         Also though, a deatil I left out which would have a major longevity 
> impact on this tank shut-off/on set-up is that the pump supplying water to 
> the tank only comes on once a day (ala digital timer), thus the tank valve, 
> seal, float, rod, etc. are only cycled once/day.  The daily water consumption 
> draw down is only about 15% of tank capacity, so we chose to pump water once 
> a day.  I guess this scenario also acts as a safety for an event like the one 
> you described, months of pumping for naught do to failed float shaft.
>  
>  
> Bill
> Feather River Solar Electric
> 4291 Nelson St.
> Taylorsville, CA  95983
> 530-284-7849/6544 fax
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: R Ray Walters
> To: RE-wrenches
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] two VFX3524's and a Franklin 3hp sub pump
> 
> Float valves too have been problematic. Seals wear and leak after several 
> years, and just a couple of months ago, we had the brass shaft that connects 
> the float to the valve break off. In this case the tank had an over flow that 
> went into the septic. So nothing was damaged by the over filling, but no one 
> knew that was happening either. We were called to troubleshoot a grid tie 
> system that wasn't running the meter backwards, then the well pump guy came 
> out, and then finally the plumber who had done the tank system. By then, the 
> pump had run 24/7 at 10 gpm for a couple of months of fresh clean well water 
> straight into the septic. Our customer's electric bill was in the hundreds of 
> dollars.
> I wouldn't quite say they're bomb proof.
> 
> R. Walters
> [email protected]
> Solar Engineer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 10:32 PM, frenergy wrote:
> 
>> Chris,
>>  
>>         I've seen a bladder tank modulate the "shut-down" process in a 
>> up-the-hill gravity feed tank when using a (IMO) more reliable float valve 
>> rather than a float switch.  Watts model number 1250 is an example of a 
>> toilet tank method of stopping/starting flow to a tank.  With the bladder 
>> tank and a standard issue Sq D. pressure switch (in the vicinity of the 
>> wellhead) it seems to be a pretty bomb -proof set-up.
>>  
>> Bill Battagin
>>  
>> Feather River Solar Electric
>> 4291 Nelson St.
>> Taylorsville, CA  95983
>> 530-284-7849/6544 fax
>>  
>>  
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Chris Worcester
>> To: [email protected] ; 'RE-wrenches'
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] two VFX3524's and a Franklin 3hp sub pump
>> 
>> Great ideas on load management to save the DC/AC system sizing. I haven’t 
>> spent time researching their need for this 3hp pump or age and all, but 
>> definitely worth looking at that side. Since it does pump to the 3000g 
>> gravity feed tank up the hill. What’s strange is there is still a bladder 
>> tank in the garage, possibly decommissioned when they added the gravity 
>> system.
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Chris Worcester
>> Solar Wind Works
>> NABCEP Certified PV Installer
>> Phone: 530-582-4503
>> Fax: 530-582-4603
>> www.solarwindworks.com
>> [email protected]
>> "Proven Energy Solutions"
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Allan 
>> Sindelar
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:48 PM
>> To: [email protected]; RE-wrenches
>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] two VFX3524's and a Franklin 3hp sub pump
>> Chris,
>> We deal with deep wells routinely.
>> 
>> Recently we installed a GTWB system for a very enjoyable retired couple. 
>> Their needs included the goat milker, sheep barn, two freezers and a fridge, 
>> and irrigation well pump, with the system sized for continuous operation in 
>> the event of a long-term (i.e. permanent) loss of the grid. This was on one 
>> acre in the suburbs south of Albuquerque. We used an XW4548, as it was the 
>> only battery-based, 120/240, single-inverter, grid-tie unit available 
>> currently.
>> 
>> As part of the normal load-reduction process, we determined that the 2hp 
>> conventional well pump could be replaced with a 1hp soft-start SQ and have 
>> adequate head and flow for their sprinklers. Changing out the pump way more 
>> than paid for itself in the amount of inverter capacity we didn't need. 
>> 
>> I would encourage you to look at both of these related issues carefully as 
>> part of this situation: could a smaller pump meet the head and flow 
>> requirements of this site, and is a soft-start pump available? Usually, if 
>> an inverter or stack of them can't handle a big inductive load like a 
>> conventional pump, it's because of the starting surge. I suspect a smaller 
>> soft-start pump may be doable in your situation.
>> Allan
>> 
>> Allan Sindelar
>> [email protected]
>> NABCEP Certified Photovoltaic Installer
>> EE98J Journeyman Electrician
>> Positive Energy, Inc.
>> 3201 Calle Marie
>> Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
>> 505 424-1112
>> www.positiveenergysolar.com
>> 
>> Hello offgrid Wrenches,
>> I just inherited an off grid system with one VFX3524 inverter running the 
>> home loads, and a 17kW Guardian Generac they use for charging (through an 
>> X-240 back into the inverter) & to run their Franklin 3hp 240 VAC well pump, 
>> S. F. max amp 17.0 ( rated on its controller)
>> This is a really convoluted system as they have another 120/240 VAC 
>> Transformer to have the inverter talk to the 240 volt signal the gen set 
>> needs to see. Yikes.
>> So I am proposing to add a second inverter if it can run the well pump and 
>> eliminate the extra transformer. This will also reduce gen set run time in 
>> half while battery charging, a big plus with the nice 24V Hawker battery 
>> bank, 1020 AH at the 6 hour rate.
>> There aren’t any other unusual large AC loads in the home, just the fridge, 
>> washer, computer, and such. LPG for cooking, water heating, clothes dryer.
>> Thanks in advance for all ideas here!
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Chris Worcester
>> Solar Wind Works
>> NABCEP Certified PV Installer
>> Phone: 530-582-4503
>> Fax: 530-582-4603
>> www.solarwindworks.com
>> [email protected]
>> "Proven Energy Solutions"

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to