Greetings Esteemed Wrenches:

I've just heard back from our inspector here in Colorado, and we are still being required to disconnect the batteries under 690.12. No where in 690.12 are batteries mentioned, nor in the appropriate 690.71 section that deals with batteries. The entire reasoning behind this is based on a single article written by a single person: Bill Brooks. I have contacted both Outback and Magnum on this issue, and their engineers are unaware that rapid shutdown applies. My interpretation is that I could install an inverter and battery system that was charged from a generator, and we would not need any rapid shutdown at all. But according to Bill, as soon as I put a single solar module into the system, suddenly the entire system becomes PV? The problem lies with the term 'PV System circuit' used in 690.12. 690.2 Defines 'PV Output circuit', and 'PV source circuit', but there is no 'PV system circuit' defined. 690.12 therefore uses an undefined term. Our design uses 2 inverters, so if we used Midnite's E panel with their remote trip breakers, the 2nd inverter would be more than 5 ft from the batteries. If we used Magnum or Outback DC disconnects (that would comply with the 5 ft rule specified in 690.71) they don't offer remote trip. We have a Midnite Rapid disconnect Combiner on the roof with the Birdhouse, so we are complying with 690.12, it should not be applied to batteries though.

Thanks,

--
R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to