Sourceforge.net also offers SVN hosting now I believe.

-Cliff


On 2/28/06, Jared Rypka-Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug,
>
> If you were to take Simeon up on his offer of SSVN+Trac this issue would go
> away instantly since the system he uses is built around the mod_dav plugin
> and Apache+Subversion integration. The other nice byproduct of this is the
> fact that people can at least get to the repository via any DAV connector
> including the one that's built in to Dreamweaver 8. No write access, but
> since it's a DAV plugin as far as Apache is concerned it implements the DAV
> protocol for interaction. It means that you can at least download the
> current version of the repo without using an SVN client.
>
> It'd also enable bug reports with bug numbers, repo version associated with
> bug fixes, repo browsing via HTTP, and a homepage/wiki/blog to boot. If it's
> available I can only recommend you take advantage of it.
>
> That would be my suggestion. :)
>
> Laterz,
> J
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Jared C. Rypka-Hauer
>
> Continuum Media Group LLC
>
> http://www.web-relevant.com
>
> Member, Team Macromedia - ColdFusion
>
>
>
>
> "That which does not kill me makes me stranger." - Yonah Schmeidler
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Peter J. Farrell wrote:
>
> Chris Tilley said the following on 2/28/2006 8:40 AM:
> Peter,
>
> You are exactly right, that is my work problem.  I'm not sure I
> understand your suggestion with Apache mod?  Any suggestions, tutorial
> that will assist me would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Is there a way to change the port that is used for TortoiseSVN?
>
> Thanks all
> Chris
> Nope. As Doug said, he uses the Subversion daemon which use port 3690.
> This is why I advocate using Subversion with the dav module in Apache
> because all your requests are over http and port 80 instead of the
> svn:// protocol.  You could also use svn+ssh if you have ssh
> infrastructure in place, but this causes a bit of a problem for Windows
> users since Windows does not ship with an ssh client (BTW, Putty is an
> excellent choice if you are in need of a  ssh client for Windows and it
> integrates with TortoiseSVN as well).  Anyways, svn+ssh  requires a few
> extra bits of configuration and isn't a great solution for anon
> repository access (like here with Reactor).  In the end, if you want a
> robust solution (such as integration with LDAP, Windows domain or plain
> old basic http authentication/authorization) -- Apache + Subversion is
> the way to go.  Also, you won't have to open up as many ports on your
> firewall if you run Apache on a standard port (something your net admin
> would probably will thank you for).
>
> The only thing I can think of is to use a proxy server which can be
> setup in the Tortoise settings (right-click -> TortoiseSVN -> Settings
> -> click on Network in the left column).
>
> Doug, you might consider running the svn daemon on an alternate http
> port like 8080, 81, or 8090.  However, then you have to make sure that
> people access the repo with that port.  Invoke that option by using the
> the --listen-port= option when running the daemon (the daemon defaults
> to 3690 without it).  Although the changes are slim that some firewall
> may block those options as well.
>
> Ok, I'm done evangelizing Subversion.
>
> Best,
> .Peter
>
> --
> Peter J. Farrell :: Maestro Publishing
> Member Team Mach-II :: Member Team Fusion
> http://blog.maestropublishing.com
>
> Create boilerplate beans and transfer objects for ColdFusion!
> Fire up a cup of Rooibos!
> http://rooibos.maestropublishing.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected]
> -- Archives at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>
>
>
>



-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected]
-- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/


Reply via email to