On 3/23/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I maybe trying to hard to compare things to the java world here. In the Java > world I can swap out Hibernate, Castor, and now even EJB3 just by adjusting > my DAOs. I can do this because both those frameworks support the standard > java bean naming conventions.
Naming conventions are part of the picture, but remember that something like Hibernate works on a different philosophy. Reactor is an active record type model in which all your beans extend a base class in Reactor. Hibernate doesn't require this because rather than calling save() directly on your beans, for example, you pass your beans to Hibernate and it does the work. Just pointing out that this isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison. Matt -- Matt Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mattwoodward.com -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
