On 3/23/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is is true Matt, but what we have found with our sample application is > that we are to abstract the rest of the Reactor API easily through our > service layer. The getXyzRecord() is the main method name that held us back. > We figure we should propose changing it. It certainly won't be the end of > the world if this change doesn't happen but we thought it was something for > the community to consider. > > I am going to continue work on example to show how we are doing our > abstraction. I am going going to need the weekend to complete it. :)
Cool--we just started doing a small application with Reactor (loving it so far, by the way) but I'll be curious to see examples of how you approach this issue. Matt -- Matt Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mattwoodward.com -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
