On 3/23/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it isn't the > case then I guess we don't have a good enough point to get Reactor change > the auto generated methods like getAddressRecord() to getAddress().
But aren't there two possible types here? - getAddressRecord() - with a hasOne relationship - getAddressIterator() - with a hasMany relationship How do you handle the second case in your "ColdFusion-is-Java" world? > I maybe trying to hard to compare things to the java world here. In the Java > world I can swap out Hibernate, Castor, and now even EJB3 just by adjusting > my DAOs. So write a DAO that wraps Reactor. You don't try to change Hibernate, Castor or EJB3 - you just wrap it. Do the same with Reactor or Transfer or objectBreeze or Arf! or... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
