I had thought about putting them in the record as well. However i ran into a couple problems with that. Well i assumed I woudl have problems so I didnt go any further.
The problem that I ran into is that I use reactor with complex objects. so many of the objects I return have other objects in side them. Because of the naming scheme in reactor this is not convienent because (in theory) I would need a property called subElementIterator or subElementRecord in order to get my array of sub items to translate well.
Have you tried putting the cfproperty in the record object? Did you run into any of the problems I express above? I feel like the transfer object represents exactly what I really want in terms of an object. Plus returning the transfer object allows me an opportunity to massage some of the data so that it fits my Flex project better.
Just curious how this was working out for you. Talk to you soon.
simeon
On 3/25/06, João Fernandes <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
proceeded like you did and I already reported that it works like a charm.
What Sean also mention was if we could put them in the record object instead of the TOs since AS3 can also recognize getters and setters.
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
