|
The iterator is going to be tweaked a bit
too. Right now the iterator is cached in the record. That’s not right. It
shouldn’t be for various reasons. That and I’m going to try to make it possible
to add and delete items from Iterators and have saves and validates intelegently
cascade. The same thing for hasOne relationships as appropriate. The current
event model is just not natural and I’ve learned a few lessons on how this
could be made efficient. I’m also considering downplaying the importance
of oo queries. As I work with reactor more and more I’m avoiding them for much
of anything other than the most basic queries. (We’ll see here) They’ll definitely
continue to be there and probably unchanged forever for the framework itself to
use. Doug From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jared Rypka-Hauer Wow... cool. I've got both in mine because I tweaked the XSL... but yeah, it is very
natural. And getObjIterator() still feels right, even with that change. Laterz, J ------------------------------------------------ Jared
C. Rypka-Hauer Continuum
Media Group LLC Member,
Team Macromedia - ColdFusion "That
which does not kill me makes me stranger." - Yonah Schmeidler On Apr 14, 2006, at 8:58 AM, Doug Hughes wrote:
FYI also,
I’ve been playing around in my code with not referring to things as records and
have found it to be very natural. As a result I’m very likely going to
remove the “Record” portion of the getXyzRecord() methods before beta.
Thus getXyzRecord() will become getXyz(). Doug -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- |
- [Reactor For CF] Removing record from getXyzRecord() met... Doug Hughes
- Re: [Reactor For CF] Removing record from getXyzRec... Jared Rypka-Hauer
- RE: [Reactor For CF] Removing record from getXy... Doug Hughes
- Re: [Reactor For CF] Removing record from g... Paul Kenney
- RE: [Reactor For CF] Removing record fr... Doug Hughes
- Re: [Reactor For CF] Removing reco... Jared Rypka-Hauer
- RE: [Reactor For CF] Removing ... Doug Hughes
