RE: [Reactor For CF] Removing record from getXyzRecord() methods.

[Doug Hughes]

One other reason.  It’s actually more consistent.   Consider when you’re creating a record:   reactorFactor.createRecord(“foo”)   Not   reactorFactor.createRecord(“foorecord”)   Doug     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Rypka-Hauer Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 11:49 AM To: reactor@doughughes.net Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Removing record from getXyzRecord() methods.   And once again Doug reminds us of three core principles used by good programmers:   1) There is never one right solution (but some are way better than others). 2) Every choice you make is a trade-off between two or more conflicting concepts. 3) NOBODY looks good in baseball cap, not even baseball players.   This message brought to you by the letter J.   ------------------------------------------------ Jared C. Rypka-Hauer Continuum Media Group LLC http://www.web-relevant.com Member, Team Macromedia - ColdFusion   "That which does not kill me makes me stranger." - Yonah Schmeidler   On Apr 14, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Doug Hughes wrote: Well, I find that I can be much more specific about what I want when I just use a regular query.  The advantage comes down to getting just what I need in a very natural manner.  The disadvantage is that it’s not as portable.    Don’t get me wrong.  I still value the OO queries and plan to enhance them over time.  I just forgot the purpose behind reactor for a bit: automate repetitive coding.  These queries are not repetitive.  They’re very specific for a particular purpose.  It makes since to write them out.  This is consistent with the purpose of reactor.   Doug -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- reactor@doughughes.net -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/