The iterator is going to be tweaked a bit too. Right now the iterator is cached in the record. That's not right. It shouldn't be for various reasons. That and I'm going to try to make it possible to add and delete items from Iterators and have saves and validates intelegently cascade. The same thing for hasOne relationships as appropriate. The current event model is just not natural and I've learned a few lessons on how this could be made efficient.
I'm also considering downplaying the importance of oo queries. As I work with reactor more and more I'm avoiding them for much of anything other than the most basic queries. (We'll see here) They'll definitely continue to be there and probably unchanged forever for the framework itself to use.
Doug
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jared Rypka-Hauer
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Removing record from getXyzRecord() methods.
Wow... cool.
I've got both in mine because I tweaked the XSL... but yeah, it is very natural. And getObjIterator() still feels right, even with that change.
Laterz,
J
------------------------------------------------
Jared C. Rypka-Hauer
Continuum Media Group LLC
Member, Team Macromedia - ColdFusion
"That which does not kill me makes me stranger." - Yonah Schmeidler
On Apr 14, 2006, at 8:58 AM, Doug Hughes wrote:
FYI also, I've been playing around in my code with not referring to things as records and have found it to be very natural. As a result I'm very likely going to remove the "Record" portion of the getXyzRecord() methods before beta. Thus getXyzRecord() will become getXyz().
Doug
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
--
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjk.us E朶�ߢ����n�*'[EMAIL PROTECTED] ��V�r�y�&���r�+�Gh�n����
