I've always found the NA guys very approachable - drop them an email.
I posted to the BD interest list back in the first week of March alerting NA that BD 7 was not compatible with blogCFC, TransferORM, and Reactor - among others. They filed some bug regarding something within the getEntries() method of blogCFC, another user replied and said that TransferORM uses two unsupported Adobe classes that cannot be ported to BD, and I haven't received any response concerning the rest. At this point I am highly disappointed with BD's compatibility with standard CFML. It appears that nearly every framework out there (whether Controller, DI/ioC, ORM, etc.) breaks on BD. The only ones that seem to work are LightWire (DI/ioC) and ObjectBreeze (ORM). I am really happy with LightWire, but ObjectBreeze has some quirks that won't be updated for another month or so. Bottom line: I have already spent more money in work hours trying to debug and test multiple frameworks and make them compatible with BD then I saved initially by choosing BD instead of CF. At this point I wish I had never chosen to use BD instead of CF. Hopefully that will change by the end of the month when the official release of BD debuts, but I doubt it. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List [email protected] Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
