As part of accelerating collaboration on our project, I'm thinking about upgrading our project hosting to SourceForge's new hosting software, which is called "Allura". We could switch to git once that's done.
But I'd like feedback before doing so - please let me know if that's a good or bad idea! Background: Allura is fully open source software. It has been submitted to the Apache Software Foundation, so it's likely to stay that way. Allura supports tickets; svn and git; and discussion forums with email as well as traditional mailing lists. Its feature list is here: https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/Features/ There are other great hosting sites, including github, gitorious, and so on. But github isn't OSS itself, which to me is a negative. There other good sites, of course. Staying in place, and just upgrading to the current SourceForge hosting software, seems like the least disruptive approach. In particular, we can keep the mailing list. But I think we need to start tracking tickets, and I'd rather upgrade/merge BEFORE doing that. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
