Alan Manuel Gloria:
> OK, I'll summarize...

I think that's a great summary.  I put it into [Current], too.

--- David A. Wheeler

===========================

> 
> First, we have a pool of syntax symbols.  Let's not fix meanings to
> symbols for now:
> 
> ~
> \
> .
> !
> $
> %
> ^
> 
> Then we have a bunch of concrete proposals:
> 
> 1.  almkglor:
> 
> Don't use GROUP
> Don't use SPLICE
> Use SPLIT
> Use ENLIST
> 
> Use 2 symbols from our pool of syntax symbols.  Current proposal: \ =
> SPLIT, ~ = ENLIST
> 
> 2.  dwheeler:
> 
> Don't use GROUP
> Don't use SPLICE
> Use SPLIT
> Don't use ENLIST
> 
> Use 1 symbol from our pool of syntax symbols.  Various: ! = SPLIT, ~ =
> SPLIT, \ = SPLIT (in order of preference?)
> 
> 3.  arne_bab:
> 
> Use GROUP + GROUP-inline=dotted list
> Use SPLICE - SPLICE-at-beginning rule
> Don't use SPLIT
> Don't use ENLIST
> 
> Use 2 symbols from our pool of syntax symbols.  Current proposal: . =
> GROUP, \ = SPLICE
> 
> Those positions/ideas look OK to consider?  Are there more ideas?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to