On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:18 AM, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: > We could start drafting a SRFI for sweet-expressions. That would give us a > target for making the specification more rigorous. I found the SRFI process > very helpful in getting new comments, so I'd hate to release a 1.0 until we > went through the SRFI process. > > Sound reasonable? >
Yes, sounds reasonable. I suppose we need to be more rigorous about the formal parsing specifications though. Sincerely, AmkG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
