Alan Manuel Gloria:
> As you pointed out before: nobody seems to have made any particularly
> serious attempts at describing indentation-sensitive syntax before.
> There's the standard "INDENT" "DEDENT" tokenization, but that may not
> work well with us, what with "!" being an indentation space outside of
> () [] {} but being a character inside of them.

Yep, but it looks like we'll have to wade in anyway.

I've been reading over the two "spec-*" files (including the one you made).  
They're both obsoleted, but I think we can use them as a starting point.  I 
propose the following:
* let's focus on getting a correct BNF embedded in the draft SRFI, instead of a 
separate file, to avoid trying to sync them up.
* we'll leave the existing spec-* files in the directory for now, so we can 
easily consult them.
* I propose using "::=" for definitions instead of "->"; the former is more 
convenient inside HTML.
* Let's start by focusing ONLY on the t-expression material (indentation, 
etc.), and IGNORE at first the BNF for n-expressions and c-expressions.  After 
all, we already have SRFI-105, so we can just appeal to that, and just stop at 
"n-expr" in the BNF for now.  We might want to add that later, but I'm not 
worried about that part.
* After looking at your try at the spec, I think I see how to do it (and in a 
simpler way) with INDENT/DEDENT/SAME.  So let's try that to start with.  We may 
need to tackle it several times before we get a clear model, another reason to 
wait to deal with the BNF of n-expressions.

--- David A. Wheeler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to