I said:
> We could start drafting a SRFI for sweet-expressions.
> Sound reasonable?

AmkG:
> Yes, sounds reasonable.  I suppose we need to be more rigorous about
> the formal parsing specifications though.

I've put a first cut of a SRFI in the "devel" branch, as file SRFI-sweet.html.

Comments/improvements?  Feel free to add to its content, then add yourself to 
the author list :-).

The file "spec-indent.txt" has our older efforts at defining a BNF, though it's 
now seriously out of date.

--- David A. Wheeler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to