I said: > We could start drafting a SRFI for sweet-expressions. > Sound reasonable?
AmkG: > Yes, sounds reasonable. I suppose we need to be more rigorous about > the formal parsing specifications though. I've put a first cut of a SRFI in the "devel" branch, as file SRFI-sweet.html. Comments/improvements? Feel free to add to its content, then add yourself to the author list :-). The file "spec-indent.txt" has our older efforts at defining a BNF, though it's now seriously out of date. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss