On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Mars Saxman wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:49 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
It is a great environment for little utilities (like alarm clocks),
and cross-platform vertical market apps, but I don't expect to see
anyone make anything world-class with it, and therefore the thought
of it killing Xcode seems kind of far-fetched.
I'd suspect until RB is entirely written IN RB that XCode will be a
necessary part of REAL's development process as well.
Xcode isn't part of our development process at all.
I probably should have said gcc then ?
Somewhere along the line I'm expecting we'll get a UB version of RB and
that's got to use gcc to compile doesn't it ?
I always think XCode when really it's the underlying compiler that's
important
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
