And to further the point that Xcode is more suited for professional
development, we still do not have Universal Binary options for our
applications. Our customers are waiting, and we have no timeframe.
While other developers are already converting and testing (or already
released), we're still twiddling our thumbs waiting for RS to deliver
before we can even begin to work.
For many various and understandable reasons, RB will always be behind
the curve from Xcode. Apple develops it, and Apple can put the new
features into it the same day they are needed. RS will always need to
be playing catch-up to keep RB "modern". Fact of life, and serious
disadvantage.
--
Thom McGrath, <http://www.thezaz.com/>
"You realize you've created God in your own image when God hates all
the same people you do."
On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:28 AM, Norman Palardy wrote:
I probably should have said gcc then ?
Somewhere along the line I'm expecting we'll get a UB version of RB
and that's got to use gcc to compile doesn't it ?
I always think XCode when really it's the underlying compiler
that's important
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
