On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:50 , Mike Woodworth wrote:

i think because we dont see it, we aren't so quick to vote for other peoples bugs :)

every few weeks a discussion like this erupts, where someone stomps around with indignation that we could have all been so complacent about some such a horrible aspect of RB. and pretty much without fail they are things that I have never experienced. and i'm not some hobbiest- i'm struggling to launch an app - i'm running RB on two machines 16-20hrs a day. and i never see anything, any of these posts complain about.

so lets all try to cool the retoric. we all have a distinct set of needs and wants from RB, and it's their *job* to prioritize them to keep the most of us- not the most vocal- happy, and to continue to make enough money that they dont go belly up and screw us all.

i would love to see RB fix your problems, i really would. i'm not trying to start a flame war, but lets all keep in mind, that your needs and my needs are in conflict for RB's limited attention. i'd rather they made copy/paste work for events/constants/properties. that would affect my development time far more than this speed issue you see.

you have a means for feedback... and now that some RB developers are choosing not frequent this list anymore... that would be your best recourse.

mike
--
Mike Woodworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




If you have an better tool you don't have to run RB on two machines 16-20hrs a day.
Perhaps 8-10 hrs a day.

If you worked with RB5.5.5 8hrs/day you have to work 15hrs with RB2005/2006



Sven E Olsson


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to