In the case of Mac applications, RB2006R1 is only slightly slower than RB5.5.5 as shown in the following benchmarks run on a G5,2.7GHz. Please note that the numbers should be interpreted as operations per time. They have no absolute meaning except that they scale linearly with throughput (higher is faster).

Data for G5,2.7GHz.
benchmark               speed 5.5.5     speed 2006R1
Math (long integer) ,   1354.5          1197.0
Math (double precision) ,       1395.8          1197.0
Math (transcendental) , 1898.8          1559.6
Math (scientific mix) , 1351.3          1467.0
Math (composite score) ,        1500.1          1355.3
String Manipulation ,           1010.6          1017.8
Graphics (mixed) ,              670.5           953.0
Disk Read/Write ,               321.2           344.2
Composite Benchmark ,   1126.7          1094.2

Thus, 2006R1 is slower for most math (particularly transcendentals) and faster for graphics. The good news regarding math is that thanks to Mars, two-dimensional array elements are accessed much faster in 2005/2006 so scientific math routines, which use lots of arrays, run faster.

Unfortunately, the performance of 2005/2006 is significantly slower for math on Pentium 4s but much faster for graphics (which are slower on the Mac because of buffering). I found no significant differences for 2005 versus 2006 so the results are averaged. I have no clue why math has taken such a hit on PCs. Here is the data from out computer lab. (Use a non-proportional font to display the following table):

RB version              5.5.5   2005/2006      5.5.5    2005/2006
System                G5(2GHz)  G5(2GHz)   P4(3.6GHz)  P4(3.6GHz)
Math (long integer)     1003.4    886.5       1145.9     1011.1
Math (double precision) 1022.8    884.2       1033.0      449.4
Math (transcendental)   1419.8   1173.0       1386.1      792.1
Math (scientific mix)   1004.9   1084.9       1131.2      800.6
Math (composite score)  1112.7   1007.2       1174.1      763.3
String Manipulation      745.5    756.3        896.5      884.0
Graphics (mixed)         501.2    761.2       1482.0     2119.7
Disk Read/Write          481.9    469.7        785.7      807.4
Composite Benchmark      867.2    846.6       1096.8      970.7

Finally, I note that all of my applications are larger in 2005/2006 than in 5.5.5, but the size difference is highly variable. This is a subject worth further discussion.

If anyone would like the benchmark program, please email me.

Cheers,
Bob Birge
--


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to