Not again! it seems that I read these threads every time RS comes up with something new.
It feels as though these guys are so busy putting new stuff out that they forget to seriously test their product. You can either get pissed that RS advertises RB as a final realeased product, something that should in fact be labeled as beta software, or you can say it has always been like that with them, and postpone your purchase until they get it right, which is usualy around v.x.5 You can also waste your time being mad and writing angry letters to the list, but history has showned that they don't seem to care that much, maybe it has something to with the fact that writing new stuff is always more motivating than fixing the old... Over the years, I've learnt to worry about more productive stuff and that's why I often refer to RB as toy that work best for those writing hobby applications, even though they sell it as some kind of swiss knife of the programming world. If swiss knives were as reliable as RB's new versions, there would be a lot of people still stuck in the woods... Louis > I am worried, because of how it shows the development practices at RS > are not good enough. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
