To REALbasic User Network subscribers,

From: Sam Rowlands,
From: Daniel L. Taylor,

As a small shareware company I have lots of competition. Using RB has given my competition the edge, they have 4-8 months of time where their product is going to be twice the speed of mine on Apple computers.

So why aren't you complaining to Apple? Apple:

* Knew this was coming for years.

* Spent those years optimizing their OS and development tools for it.

* Let NOBODY in the developer tools space know with sufficient lead time so that they could do the same.

* Proceeded to release Intel machines 6 months ahead of schedule, again with NO notice to developers, thereby reducing what little lead time they had promised.

I hate to play devil's advocate here, but I'm not sure this is accurate.

(1) Having a secret team shadow Mac OS X builds on 80x86-compatible hardware is a long way from a concrete plan to switch architectures. Do we know exactly _when_ the decision was made?

(2) There was no "promise" that developers would have until WWDC 2006 to churn out UB's; at least, not that I saw. I recall that Apple stated it would be shipping some models of Intel-based Macintosh by WWDC 2006, and while the idea that this meant introductions occurring very close to WWDC 2006 was widespread, it was at best an unwritten assumption.

I would certainly agree that there has _not_ been sufficient lead time for those with complicated applications or long development cycles; I believe that not only could this have been done sooner (say Jan 2005), but that it could even have been done without directly stating "we're switching to Intel architectures". I would also agree that this behaviour doesn't represent a healthy vendor-developer relationship, and represents a step backwards in Apple's efforts to make developers "happy".

Cheers, Nathan.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to