On Mar 24, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Chris Smolinski wrote:
RS has *really* dropped the ball on this one,
Never once has anyone at Real given the impression or have implied,
to me or anyone else on this list, that they do not take UB's
seriously. They have not been working on it as fast as they can. Just
like everyone else, including you Chris, they want it out now and
would have had it out by now if Apple didn't purposely hide information.
This is completely inexcusable. Does anyone at RS have a clue as
to how much of a disaster the inability of RB to produce Universal
Binaries is? This isn't a joke, this is a serious problem.
Actually, this is a disaster which is going to cost me, and well as
lots of other developers who use RB, thousands, perhaps tens of
thousands of dollars each in lost sales.
If you can do better than why don't you. Go start your own
programming environment and lets see how well you can take the heat.
Producing Universal Binaries has got to become the #1 development
effort for RB right now
If you've been paying attention, it is the highest priority right now.
On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
This is exactly where Geoff said it is on their priority list
, with all efforts directed towards it. Having to wait 9 months (or
more) for the ability to produce Universal Binaries could be fatal
to my business.
Looks like I need to do some *serious* thinking this weekend about
my software development plans.
This weekend why don't you spend sometime thinking about the damage
your attitude is doing to your business. I'm sure as hell never going
to support you or buy any of your products. Try running your bush
league business on java...
01001010 01100001 01110011 01101111 01101110
01001101 01100011 01000010 01110010 01101001 01100100 01100101
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
