What are you talking about ? For example, the last Apple IIe
computer was made in late 1993, that is not bad support.
Of course Apple will discontinue PowerPC in the future, when it makes
no sense supporting them anymore, like PPC 603 and the like.
Remember, Apple is asking for UNIVERSAL BINARIES, NOT also Intel
binaries. All apps will be Universal in the future, it doesnt add
much overhead.
Stop trying to get another mass e-mail arguing here.
Trausti
On May 10, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Emile Schwarz wrote:
Hi,
this is not a surprise for me.
Non Mac Intel Macintosh machines are ... deprecated ? OOL ? <add
your qualificatives here>
Yes, when a new hardware line comes to replace an existing one,
that "existing one" is deprecated and will goes out of scope fast,
very fast, even if the manufacturer says "wewill support it..."
So, be aware that Mac OS X 10.5 will be the last OS to support non
MacIntel hardware (or will it be Mac OS X 10.6 ?)
Same appears for Apple II, Apple III, 68K Macintosh, now PPC
Macintosh; nothing really new under the sun...
Emile
PS: Stephen, I know what your message was asking (WHEN WILL WE GET
A CURRENT REALbasic VERSION - a.k.a. a REALbasic version who
compiles for the current Hardware: MacIntel... -)
Subject: REALbasic Apps ineligible for Apple Design Awards
From: Stephen Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:03:29 -0600
The good news is Apple Design Awards are now open until June 16.
The bad news is, you don't qualify.
New this year in their terms and conditions are all entries must
be Universal Binary.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
