On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andy Dent wrote:
On 18/07/2006, at 2:14 AM, Norman Palardy wrote:
And since REAL would be using the same IDE as us and experiencing
the same bugs then they may get fixed quicker becuase they would
annoy the folks at REAl as much as they annoy us
Except that they blew their credibility on marketing and the
usefulness of this issue by having their internal version 5.5.9 and
letting the rest of us know about their use of it instead of RB200x.
I am starting to think that 5.5.9 was a huge mistake on RS' part.
I made no claims about how well this had or had not worked so far.
Just that is the theory about why you'd want to do this.
I think we will see a difference once they do start using the current
version to write the next one.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
