>From what I have read many license agreements contain language is simply unenforceable. Reverse engineering is one that can be done if it meets certain requirements *regardless of license agreement*. Here is a link that provides some of those clauses:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00001201----000-. html I'm not a lawyer but it seems to me that what Dr.Steinman is trying to do would fall under the provisions since he is attempting to create an application that has some level of interoperability with RB. ~joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Norman Palardy Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 1:43 PM To: REALbasic NUG Subject: Re: RB Language Reference parsing? Parsing the various Framework.o files inside the RB package should be accurate, but you have to break your license agreement's non-reverse engineering clause to do this. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
