On 12 Oct 2006, at 21:10, Long Huynh wrote:
I disagree, since there are so many people response to this thread,
it means something important, not the waste of time.
If REALbasic is not a fit for serious business than tell me why VB
has been used in every corporate America?
Isn't RS trying to get VB programmers to convert? I think RB is a
better software than VB, and I hope it will in used by all
corporate USA over VB.
However, before it gets there, it should be more than VB in order
to satisfy the needs of programmers of all sorts.
You might think this is waste of time now, but these might be the
very valueable ideas than make RB a successful tool.
I'm sure RS people would like to hear our needs. Why don't you
through in some good ideas w/ us.
I never said RB was bad- I use it quite a lot, but I don't develop my
bread & butter software in it, so I can't comment on Craig's criticisms.
I agree, VB makes me want to weep.
My complaint was with the bi-annual "REALbasic would be so much
better if it had W, X, and Y operator from language Z" thread. A
thread which invariably goes on for days.
Incidentally, VB does not have ++ or -- or any variant thereof.
--
Kind regards,
James Milne
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
