On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote:
On 12/10/06 19:46, "Theodore H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a slippery slope.
Ok ok I retract my heresy on the ++ ;0
I'll trade the ++, += requests in return for being able to tag any
method
as "inline" - hows that ??
INLINE would be awesome !
I think the biggest and main one we need, is .NextValue for pointers.
Agreed, but if theyre doing that, I think a more generalised syntax
using -
YES - the C style [] parens - would be desirable.
If we are acessing Declare or memoryblock stuff by pointer ops we
shouldn't
assume it will only in sequential fashion. Random access via
[index] might
be just as useful.
The hard part is how to differentiate for a newbie when to use () and
when to ue [] without delving into some very tangled explanations
Proper iterators, like Java has, would be useful
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
