Since .NET is so good, I wonder why RS have NOT include .NET in RB. I would like to see RB supports .NET too as my wishlist.
----- Original Message ---- From: Björn Eiríksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: REALbasic NUG <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:39:02 PM Subject: Re: Language addition proposals On 12.10.2006, at 21:26, Long Huynh wrote: > I would stay away from .NET whether or not it support ++ and +=. > It's the .NET that pisses everyone off. The .NET is pissing off the non programmers who barely were able to learn the basics of VB 6, those are not willing to spend time learning something different. With that said then I cannot praise the .NET enough. It is just amazing piece of engineering. That does not mean that REALbasic is not good, it is just in my mind not comparable. The aim is very different with REALbasic. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Björn Eiríksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Einhugur Software http://www.einhugur.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ Einhugur Software has sold its products in 54 countries world wide. ______________________________________________________________________ For support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post on the maillist: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
